Homotopies in Classical and Paraconsistent Modal Logics

نویسنده

  • Can Baskent
چکیده

Bisimulations and van Benthem’s celebrated theorem provide a direct insight how truth preserving operations in modal logics work. Apart from bisimulations, there are several other operations in basic modal logic that preserve the truth (Blackburn et al., 2001). However, there is a problem. Given a modal model, and several bisimilar copies of it, there is no method to compare or measure the differences between bisimilar models apart from the basic model theoretical methods (i.e. they are submodels of each other, for instance). A rather negative slogan for this issue is the following: Modal language cannot distinguish bisimilar models. Since the modal language cannot count or measure, several extensions of the language has been proposed to tackle this issue such as hybrid logics and majority logics (Blackburn, 2000; Fine, 1972). However, such extensions are language based and introduce a non-natural, and sometimes counter-intuitive operators to the language, and often criticized as being ad-hoc. In this work, we will focus on the truth preserving operations rather than extending the modal language. In other words, we will ask the following question: Is there a truth preserving natural modal operation that can also distinguish the models it generates, and even compares them? We argue that such an operation exist, and the answer to that question is positive. However, to conceptualize our concerns and questions, we need to be careful at picking the correct modal logical framework. Kripkean models, in this respect, are criticized as they are overly simplistic and can overshadow some mathematical properties that can be apparent in some other modal models. Therefore, in this paper, we will concentrate on topological models for modal logics. On the other hand, note that topological models historically precede Kripke models, and are mathematically more complex allowing us to express variety of ideas within modal logic. Therefore, they can provide us with much stronger and richer structure of which we can take advantage. In this paper, we utilize a rather elementary concept from topology. We first introduce homemorphisms, and then homotopies to the modal logical framework, and show the immediate invariance results. On the other hand, from an application oriented point of view, we also have some applications to illustrate how our constructions

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Some Non-Classical Methods in (Epistemic) Modal Logic and Games: A Proposal

In this proposal, we discuss several non-classical frameworks, and their applications in epistemic modal logic. We largely consider topological semantics, as opposed to widely used Kripke semantics, paraconsistent systems, as opposed to consistent systems, and non-well-founded sets, as opposed to ZF(C) set theory. We discuss topological public announcement logics, introduce homotopies to modal ...

متن کامل

A paraconsistent view on B and S5

Paraconsistent logics are logics that in contrast to classical and intuitionistic logic, do not trivialize inconsistent theories. In this paper we show that the famous modal logics B and S5, can be viewed as paraconsistent logics with several particularly useful properties.

متن کامل

Modal Extensions of Sub-classical Logics for Recovering Classical Logic

In this paper we introduce non-normal modal extensions of the sub-classical logics CLoN, CluN and CLaN, in the same way that S0.5 extends classical logic. The first modal system is both paraconsistent and paracomplete, while the second one is paraconsistent and the third is paracomplete. Despite being non-normal, these systems are sound and complete for a suitable Kripke semantics. We also show...

متن کامل

Nearly every normal modal logic is paranormal

An overcomplete logic is a logic that ‘ceases to make the difference’: According to such a logic, all inferences hold independently of the nature of the statements involved. A negation-inconsistent logic is a logic having at least one model that satisfies both some statement and its negation. A negation-incomplete logic has at least one model according to which neither some statement nor its ne...

متن کامل

Paraconsistent logic from a modal viewpoint

In this paper we study paraconsistent negation as a modal operator, considering the fact that the classical negation of necessity has a paraconsistent behavior. We examine this operator on the one hand in the modal logic S5 and on the other hand in some new four-valued modal logics.  2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1107.4932  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011